Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:59:50.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hedley Bull, states systems and international societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Extract

Hedley Bull's contribution to the theory of international relations is considerable; and nowhere more acute than in the distinction which he made between the concept of a system of states and that of an international society. His definitive formulation is set out in Chapter I of The Anarchical Society. ‘Where states are in regular contact with one another, and where in addition there is interaction between them sufficient to make the behaviour of each a necessary element in the calculations of the other, then we may speak of their forming a system.’ ‘A society of states (or international society) exists when a group of states, conscious of certain common interests and common values, form a society in the sense that they conceive themselves to be bound by a common set of rules in their relations with one another, and share in the working of common institutions.’

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (London, 1977), p. 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. Ibid., p. 13.

3. Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.),The Expansion of International Society (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar.

4. See Watson, , Diplomacy: The Dialogue Between States (London, 1983), p. 95.Google Scholar

5. Bull, The Anarchical Society, p. 13.

6. Heeren, A., Manual of the History of the Political System of Europe, vol. 1 (Oxford, 1834), pp. 7Google Scholar, 8.

7. Bull, The Anarchical Society, p. 13.

8. Best, Geoffrey, The Times Literary Supplement, 1 February 1985.Google Scholar