To read this content please select one of the options below:

Recruitment in small firms: Processes, methods and problems

Marilyn Carroll (Manchester School of Management, UMIST, Manchester, UK)
Mick Marchington (Manchester School of Management, UMIST, Manchester, UK)
Jill Earnshaw (Manchester School of Management, UMIST, Manchester, UK)
Stephen Taylor (Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK)

Employee Relations

ISSN: 0142-5455

Article publication date: 1 June 1999

36925

Abstract

The article summarises findings from recent case study research into recruitment in small firms. The research aims to ascertain whether small firms follow the procedures outlined in the prescriptive literature on recruitment, and to what extent they rely on informal recruitment methods. It finds little evidence of the adoption of the recommended systematic procedures and a high use of “tried and trusted” methods including word‐of‐mouth recruitment and the hiring of “known quantities”. The implications of this are examined. While these methods have certain advantages, they may also give rise to a number of problems. The study argues that the adoption of more formal procedures and methods could reduce staff turnover in small firms and its associated costs. However, it concludes that many small employers would remain unconvinced by the case for opening up recruitment channels, and may find their existing approaches more cost effective in the short term.

Keywords

Citation

Carroll, M., Marchington, M., Earnshaw, J. and Taylor, S. (1999), "Recruitment in small firms: Processes, methods and problems", Employee Relations, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459910273080

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1999, MCB UP Limited

Related articles